 |
|
|
|
. : About me : .
. : Recent Posts : .
Blogger "very likely" wrong on this... . : Archives : .
November 2004 . : Currently Loving : .
|
. : Links : .
Our House . : About the Site : .
. : Currently Petting : .
Bandit
. : I owe it all to.. : .
|
|
Tuesday, February 06, 2007Atleast one Lord sees it my way...A rebuttal to the article in the previous post: HERE! Finally, someone else sees that when you combine meterological, economic and demographic FORECASTING into one hypothesis, you end up with a lot of room for uncertainty. Of course, when the author of the paper was confronted with one of the claims that his description of carbon trading could end up being "capricious and corrupt" his response was: "It is not a very analytical use of language and I don't think it bears scrutiny frankly. " Ah, atleast he was classically trained in the art of the run around.  
|
